IndesignPerfect

Beta Feature Breakdown: What’s Still Missing from InDesign’s Collaboration Tools?

Adobe InDesign has finally entered the world of real-time collaboration with its beta rollout—but it’s not all smooth sailing just yet. If you’ve tested the new co-editing features, you’ve likely noticed a few missing pieces.

Here’s a detailed look at what’s still limited, partially implemented, or completely absent in InDesign’s real-time collaboration beta—and what designers are hoping to see next.

🚧 1. No Built-in Commenting or Review Workflow (Yet)

Unlike Figma or Google Docs, InDesign doesn’t include a native comment panel inside the collaborative workspace. This means:

  • Reviewers can’t tag users or leave feedback directly on the layout.
  • There’s no thread history or resolution tracking.
  • You still need to use PDF exports + Acrobat commenting for feedback loops.

🛠️ Workaround: Export a PDF and share it via Adobe Acrobat’s commenting tools or use third-party proofing platforms.

🚫 2. Limited Control Over User Permissions

Currently, all invited collaborators have equal editing power. There’s no:

  • Viewer-only mode
  • Editor vs Reviewer roles
  • Approval workflows

This makes it risky in high-stakes production environments with multiple contributors.

🛠️ Wish List: Role-based access and content locks for text frames or pages.

🕓 3. No Presence Tracking or Activity Feed

Unlike Figma’s live cursors or Google Docs’ activity sidebar, InDesign doesn’t yet show:

  • Who is currently active on the document
  • What areas they’re editing
  • A history of recent changes

🛠️ What’s Missing: Visual cues that help teams coordinate and avoid conflicts.

🖇️ 4. Lacks Linked Comments or Tasks

Collaboration isn’t just about editing—it’s about coordination. InDesign (Beta) still lacks:

  • Assignable tasks linked to objects or text
  • To-do markers or “resolve” buttons
  • Integration with tools like Jira, Trello, or Slack

🛠️ Next Steps: Build a basic task/comment system into the UI or allow third-party plugin integration.

🧭 5. Navigation Tools Are Still Solo-Oriented

Right now, every user navigates the document independently. There’s no way to:

  • “Follow” another user’s view
  • Lead a walkthrough or design review
  • Sync page view across collaborators

🛠️ Collaboration Dream: A “Follow Mode” for guided design sessions.

🔌 6. Plugin Ecosystem Not Yet Adapted for Multiuser

Many power users rely on plugins for automation, preflight, or creative extensions. But in the collaborative beta:

  • Plugin compatibility isn’t guaranteed
  • Some scripts may conflict with live editing
  • Dynamic updates are not yet fully synchronized

🛠️ Fix Needed: A plugin-safe collaboration mode or cloud-adapted plugin layer.

📁 7. Version Control Is Basic

InDesign Cloud Documents do save versions, but it’s not as robust as Git-style branching or Figma’s timelines. Current drawbacks:

  • No “named versions”
  • No restore preview
  • No change logs for who did what

🛠️ Feature Request: Taggable versions, side-by-side comparisons, and activity logs.

🤖 8. No AI Integration for Collaborative Design (Yet)

With Adobe Firefly rapidly evolving, we expected AI-assisted suggestions or layout recommendations for teams—but nothing is built into the collaboration beta yet.

🛠️ Vision: Smart layout helpers or AI-driven content assistants that enhance teamwork.

🔮 Conclusion: A Strong Start, But Miles to Go

The beta version of real-time collaboration in InDesign is a huge leap forward, but it’s still missing many of the features that make Figma, Notion, and Google Docs beloved by teams.

To truly modernize its workflow, Adobe will need to:

  • Add built-in commenting and tasking
  • Introduce role-based access
  • Enable navigation sync and real-time feedback
  • Expand plugin compatibility
  • Roll out AI tools for collaborative layout

Until then, it’s a promising but unfinished chapter in InDesign’s future.

Try 30 Days Free Adobe Stock
Try 30 Days Free Adobe Stock